On 10/16/07, Robert Burrell Donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 10/13/07, Bertrand Delacretaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Do we have a solid process for checking this? > > > > I'm not sure we do - each project's status page (like [1] for example) > > contains the "Are there three or more independent committers?" > > question, but unless I'm missing something we don't have a defined way > > of checking this. > > > > The simplest way to fix this might be to include, in the graduation > > vote requests, the list of active committers and affiliations, so that > > people can check it if they want. > > sounds like a reasonable approach
As I mentioned in another thread I'm not so big on this rule. Having a fixed number is IMHO a bit too rigid. Do we forbid graduation for a project with 4 active committers among which 2 are in the same company? How the project deals with its governance (are the independent committers opinion taken into account? are they ignored?) is, I think, more important. Am I the only one to think that way? That being said, having the list of active committers with affiliations in the graduation vote request would be helpful. Cheers, Matthieu - robert > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
