On 24/01/2008, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think the NOTICE files in the artifacts that are actually being > distributed are OK.
Surely the archive bundles are also distributed? == There are some discrepancies in the jar files covered by the LICENSE file - the names mentioned in the LICENSE file don't necessarily appear in the lib directory (and vice versa) (LIC=LICENSE, DIR=present in lib directory) LIC: axis2-adb-codegen-1.3.jar DIR: axis2-codegen-1.3.jar LIC: derby-10.1.3.1.jar DIR: derby-10.1.2.1.jar LIC: stax-api-1.0.2.jar DIR: stax-api-1.0-2.jar The following are mentioned in the LICENSE file, but don't appear to be present: addressing-1.3.mar maven-artifact-2.0.2.jar maven-artifact-manager-2.0.2.jar maven-error-diagnostics-2.0.2.jar maven-model-2.0.2.jar maven-profile-2.0.2.jar maven-project-2.0.2.jar maven-repository-metadata-2.0.2.jar maven-settings-2.0.2.jar opensaml-1.1.jar plexus-container-default-1.0-alpha-9.jar plexus-utils-1.1.jar rampart-1.3.mar wagon-file-1.0-alpha-7.jar wagon-http-lightweight-1.0-alpha-6.jar wagon-provider-api-1.0-alpha-6.jar Not sure what "dojotoolkit" mentioned in the LICENSE file refers to. It would be useful if the LICENSE file used a standard format for the jar files names, as is done for the ASF jars. Elsewhere in the file, jars may be listed without the .jar extension and/or without the version suffix, and sometimes multiple files are listed in a paragraph. The lack of a version suffix is potentially serious, as licenses may change between releases. > The ${pom.name} is changed by the build process so the > generated artifact has the proper name, for example, the jar built for > wsdl2java ends up with a NOTICE file containing "Apache Tuscany SCA > WSDL2Java Tool", see inside: > http://people.apache.org/~slaws/tuscany/1.1-RC3/maven/org/apache/tuscany/sca/tuscany-wsdl2java/1.1-incubating/tuscany-wsdl2java-1.1-incubating.jar That looks OK. . > > The mortgage-loanapproval is only distributed within the src and bin > distributions and the NOTICE file in those distributions does include all > the necessary references so that also looks ok to me. > > Including the Derby.log is a mistake, but I don't think its a blocker :) Agreed. Though it reveals something about the builder's PC environment, so they may wish it was not present ;-) There are several other derby.log files in the source archive. There's also some 40GB of log-nnn.dat files in the tuscany-sca-1.1-incubating-src\itest\jms\activemq-data\localhost\journal directory in the source archive. Another smaller log file in: tuscany-sca-1.1-incubating-src\modules\implementation-openjpa\test\log There are also 3 db.lck files. Are these really needed for the source archive? > +1 to release. > > ...ant > > On Jan 23, 2008 10:55 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Some of the NOTICE files start with the text: > > > > ${pom.name} > > > > e.g. > > > > tools/wsdl2java > > and > > modules/policy > > > > This does not seem right. > > > > The top-level NOTICE and LICENSE files in demos/mortgage-loanapproval > > are the standard ASF ones - however NOTICE and LICENSE.txt in the > > demos/mortgage-loanapproval/src/main/resources/META-INF directory > > include additional references to Eclipse licenses. > > > > Again, I would expect the top-level L&N files for a directory tree to > > agree with the lower level ones. > > > > The file apache-tuscany-sca-1.1-incubating-src.tar.gz contains the > > file derby.log which perhaps should not be there. > > > > On 23/01/2008, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > The Tuscany project had a vote on [EMAIL PROTECTED] to publish > > the > > > Tuscany SCA Java 1.1-incubating release. The vote thread on tuscany-dev > > has > > > 7 +1s and an archive can be found at: > > > > > > http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-dev%40ws.apache.org/msg27321.html > > > > > > The release includes new function and bug fixes. You can see a list of > > > changes at: > > > > > > > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/tags/java/sca/1.1-RC3/distribution/src/main/release/CHANGES > > > > > > > > > The signed binary and source distributions, the RAT reports, and the > > Maven > > > staging repository are listed at the following links. > > > > > > SVN Tag: > > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/tags/java/sca/1.1-RC3/ > > > > > > Stage maven repo: > > > http://people.apache.org/~slaws/tuscany/1.1-RC3/maven/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eslaws/tuscany/1.1-RC3/maven/> > > > <http://people.apache.org/%7Eslaws/tuscany/1.1-RC3/maven/> > > > > > > RAT report: > > > http://people.apache.org/~slaws/tuscany/1.1-RC3/rat-1.1-RC3.txt<http://people.apache.org/%7Eslaws/tuscany/1.1-RC3/rat-1.1-RC3.txt> > > <http://people.apache.org/%7Eslaws/tuscany/1.1-RC3/rat-1.1-RC3.txt> > > > > > > Binary and source distros (zip/gz/asc/md5) : > > > http://people.apache.org/~slaws/tuscany/1.1-RC3/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eslaws/tuscany/1.1-RC3/> > > <http://people.apache.org/%7Eslaws/tuscany/1.1-RC3/> > > > > > > Please review and approve the release. This vote will remain open for at > > > least 72 hours. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Simon > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]