The CXF build fails several tests. Environment: Maven version: 2.0.8 Java version: 1.5.0_13 OS name: "windows xp" version: "5.1" arch: "x86" Family: "windows"
Log file: http://people.apache.org/~sebb/CXF On 30/01/2008, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There are several problems with the NOTICE and LICENSE files. > > The NOTICE file should only pertain to artefacts actually included in > distribution; it should not have any details of transitive > dependencies. So the "/uses" text should be removed. > > The line > > This product includes/uses software(s) developed by 'an unknown organization' > > is rather unhelpful; there are 3 organisations involved and the NOTICE > should mention these separately and by their proper names. > > There are also multiple additional mentions of 'Apache Software > Foundation'; some of these give http://jakarta.apache.org/ as the ASF > web address, which is clearly wrong. None of the additional mentions > should be present - they just make the file difficult to read. > > The LICENSE file needs to contain copies of all the 3rd party > licenses, or at least pointers to them, see: > > http://www.apache.org/dev/apply-license.html#new > > It should list the exact jars to which the 3rd party licenses apply, e.g. > > jdom-1.0.jar - see licenses/jdom.txt > > Having the version number is important as the license may change for > different versions. > > > On 30/01/2008, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The policy page says: > > > > "Therefore, should a Podling decide it wishes to perform a release, the > > Podling SHALL hold a vote on the Podling's public -dev list. At least three > > +1 votes are required (see the Apache Voting Process page), and only the > > PPMC member votes are binding. If the majority of all votes is positive, > > then the Podling SHALL send a summary of that vote to the Incubator's > > general list and formally request the Incubator PMC approve such a release. > > Three +1 Incubator PMC votes are required." - > > http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Releases > > > > Its a separate approval vote so wouldn't that require an explicit vote? Is > > it so hard to vote over here as well? > > +1 > > > ...ant > > > > On Jan 29, 2008 6:10 PM, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > As long as the vote was for the *same artifact*, I don't see what > > > difference it makes *where* the vote was posted. > > > > > > Craig > > > > > > On Jan 28, 2008, at 11:20 PM, ant elder wrote: > > > > > > > I'm not sure those votes on cxf-dev count in this vote unless they > > > > vote in > > > > this thread, no mater though as there are enough votes here now. > > > > > > > > ...ant > > > > > > > > On Jan 26, 2008 5:56 PM, Daniel Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> Just a quick update while the vote is open..... > > > >> > > > >> Jim Jagielski and Jeff Genender both voted +1 on the thread on cxf- > > > >> dev. > > > >> Thus, that's two additional binding IPMC votes. Vote is still > > > >> open.... :-) > > > >> > > > >> Dan > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> On Friday 25 January 2008, Daniel Kulp wrote: > > > >>> We held a vote on cxf-dev to release a new version of CXF. This > > > >>> version is pretty much just a big "bug fix rollup" compared to 2.0.3 > > > >>> fixing over 50 JIRA issues reported by users and bugs encountered > > > >>> during some interop testing. > > > >>> > > > >>> For a full list of the issues, see: > > > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=1231285 > > > >>> 5&styleName=Html&projectId=12310511&Create=Create > > > >>> > > > >>> The vote thread is at: > > > >>> http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE--Release-CXF-2.0.4-incubator-to15025947.ht > > > >>> ml > > > >>> > > > >>> In summary, we have 11 +1 votes, no 0 or -1 votes. Two of the > > > >>> votes > > > >>> are from ASF members (bsnyder and gnodet). I'm not sure if they > > > >>> are > > > >>> binding yet or not. (I think they both sent in requests to join the > > > >>> IPMC, just not sure if that is finished yet). > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> The staging area is at: > > > >>> http://people.apache.org/~dkulp/stage_cxf/2.0.4-incubator<http://people.apache.org/%7Edkulp/stage_cxf/2.0.4-incubator> > > > <http://people.apache.org/%7Edkulp/stage_cxf/2.0.4-incubator > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> The distributions are in the "dist" directory. The "m2repo" > > > >>> directory > > > >>> contains the stuff that will by pushed to the > > > >>> m2-incubating-repository. > > > >>> > > > >>> This release is tagged at: > > > >>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/cxf/tags/cxf-2.0.4-incubator > > > >>> / > > > >>> > > > >>> We and our users appreciate you taking the time to look over this > > > >>> release! > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> -- > > > >> J. Daniel Kulp > > > >> Principal Engineer, IONA > > > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >> http://www.dankulp.com/blog > > > >> > > > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > Craig Russell > > > Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo > > > 408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp! > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
