On 19/02/2008, Simon Nash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: <snip/> > > One topic from the tuscany-user discussion that's worth exposing here > is whether the NNY project would be a "pure RI" with no extensions > beyond the spec, or a vehicle for innovation to extend the specs, as > both Tuscany SCA and SDO have been. My view is that it will need to > be at least some of the latter in order to build a sustainable > community of developers and users.
+1 This will create some challenges > given that one of the goals of the NNY project is to deliver the > official JCP RI. > > Simon <snip/> I just asked a question on the jcp-open mailing list to find out how other projects that do RIs in Apache handle the apparent contention. It should appear under a February 2008 heading in the mailing list archive at [1] shortly. Kelvin. [1] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/www-jcp-open/
