Right now the project lacks a Champion and Mentors and I don't want
to call for a vote before having those. The proposal is also not as
well written as it should be because it lacks a lot of
detail. However, as Noel mentioned we are going to move the
architecture discussions to the projects@ list so that we can hammer
out the rest of the details and get a better proposal without
flooding the general@ list.
Angie
At 07:58 PM 7/3/2008, you wrote:
With regards to process, what is still missing that is preventing
Angela to call a vote to get the project accepted into Incubation ? I
just want to make sure we are not waiting for the suggestions from
Sling and Tuscany, as I see these discussions and/or contributions as
something that can happen during incubation in a much structured way.
On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 4:46 PM, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> since currently this software project is merely an idea (along
>> with some previously tinkered with codebases), I'd say it's a
>> perfect candidate for a lab. It doesn't sound like it's ready
>> for a release just yet. :)
>
> When were either of those two things criteria for Incubation? And there is
> code, but to give credit, the project is prepared to discard all of it in
> order to build community.
>
> --- Noel
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
--
Luciano Resende
Apache Tuscany Committer
http://people.apache.org/~lresende
http://lresende.blogspot.com/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
