On May 12, 2009, at 3:09 PM, sebb wrote:
On 12/05/2009, Craig L Russell <craig.russ...@sun.com> wrote:On May 12, 2009, at 2:08 PM, Brian Fox wrote:Earlier, sebb wrote:I don't think it's OK to expect users to have to trawl through all theNOTICE and LICENSE files to find all the required information. IMO, the top-level L & N files need to relate to the entire contents.
clr: we are in agreement.
Transitively or just for the first level dependencies?Dependencies that are not *shipped* with the distribution are neither NOTICEd nor LICENSEd in the distribution.+1, that's what I meant; sorry I was not clearer.
clr: we are in agreement. It was clear to me.
Of course external dependencies - to first level at least - *ought* to be documented to ensure the consumer knows what else is needed to use the product, but they go elsewhere, e.g. in the README and/or on the web-site.
clr: we are in agreement.
Craig Craig L Russell Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo 408 276-5638 mailto:craig.russ...@sun.com P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Craig L Russell Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://db.apache.org/jdo 408 276-5638 mailto:craig.russ...@sun.com P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
