On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 1:04 PM, Jan Lehnardt<j...@apache.org> wrote: > > On 21 Aug 2009, at 08:58, ant elder wrote: > >> What do people think about changing the poddling release voting >> process so that there is just a single vote which is held on the >> poddlings dev list instead of the dual voting we have now with a >> poddling dev list vote followed by an general@ vote? This would be >> similar to the changes done recently for committer and PPMC votes >> which removed the dual voting and help empower the poddlings. There >> would of course still be the minimum requirement of 3 +1s from IPMC >> members, and a notification process so the IPMC is fully aware of the >> vote. Can work out the details of that later in a formal doc change >> proposal but first I'd like to see if there's much support for or >> against such a change? > > Another -1 for many of the reasons stated already. I found the current > procedure very helpful when incubating CouchDB. I don't think doing > only the first release here is a good idea.
- 1 as well. The current procedure help us (Apache MyFaces Trinidad) as well. We did several release here and we gained a lot out of that. -Matthias > > Cheers > Jan > -- > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
