On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 4:01 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu <gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com> wrote: > Hi Niall; > >>>>The usual process is to allow 72hrs for a vote and not just declare it >>>>when 3 votes are received. Also Sebb raised an issue and IMO its good >>>>etiquette to allow discussions to run their course before declaring a >>>>vote. > >>>>"Votes should generally be permitted to run for at least 72 hours to >>>>provide an opportunity for all concerned persons to participate >>>>regardless of their geographic locations." >>>>from http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html > > I have already know those rules!. > > Besides, I was a bit of rush because of waiting too much to release :) > Otherwise we were not able to release something that our community uses!
on goal of incubation is also to LEARN the Apache rules, not only to produce code. As the main focus is to attract this podling to new developers, there is no need to rush on providing a release for "use-only" users. We want committers. These should be able to get the svn TAG and work on that... > >>>>Also Sebb raised an issue and IMO its good >>>>etiquette to allow discussions to run their course before declaring a >>>>vote. > > I responded Sebb explanations. I thought that it may not block this release! > > If possible I would like to apply Sebb's concerns in next M4 release that we > will try to be perfect :) not sure what exactly he said, but please file a JIRA ticket for it, to not forget about it. -Matthias > > Thanks; > > --Gurkan > > > ________________________________ > From: Niall Pemberton <niall.pember...@gmail.com> > To: general@incubator.apache.org > Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2009 2:26:57 AM > Subject: Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Release OpenWebBeans M3 > > On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 10:30 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu > <cgurkanerdo...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi; >> >> The [VOTE] is now closed. The [VOTE] to release OpenWebBeans-M3 is >> successful. >> >> There are three +1 binding > > The usual process is to allow 72hrs for a vote and not just declare it > when 3 votes are received. Also Sebb raised an issue and IMO its good > etiquette to allow discussions to run their course before declaring a > vote. > > "Votes should generally be permitted to run for at least 72 hours to > provide an opportunity for all concerned persons to participate > regardless of their geographic locations." > from http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html > > "The community then tries to gather consensus on an alternative > proposal that resolves the issue. In the great majority of cases, the > concerns leading to the negative vote can be addressed." > from http://www.apache.org/foundation/how-it-works.html#decision-making > > Niall > >> +1 Votes >> ----------------- >> * Kevan Miller (binding) >> * Matthias Wessendorf (binding) >> * Niall Pemberton (binding) >> >> >> I will add distribution artifacts to the incubator "dist/" place and >> upload to m3-incubator-repository >> >> Thanks to all; >> >> -- Gurkan >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
