On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 10:25 AM, Niall Pemberton <niall.pember...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 3:01 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu <gurkanerdo...@yahoo.com> > wrote: >> Hi Niall; >> >>>>>The usual process is to allow 72hrs for a vote and not just declare it >>>>>when 3 votes are received. Also Sebb raised an issue and IMO its good >>>>>etiquette to allow discussions to run their course before declaring a >>>>>vote. >> >>>>>"Votes should generally be permitted to run for at least 72 hours to >>>>>provide an opportunity for all concerned persons to participate >>>>>regardless of their geographic locations." >>>>>from http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html >> >> I have already know those rules!. > > Then I'm surprised you chose to do something different and IMO > impatience isn't a good enough reason. > >> Besides, I was a bit of rush because of waiting too much to release :) >> Otherwise we were not able to release something that our community uses! >> >>>>>Also Sebb raised an issue and IMO its good >>>>>etiquette to allow discussions to run their course before declaring a >>>>>vote. >> >> I responded Sebb explanations. I thought that it may not block this release! > > Sebb indicated that he thought that one of the points he raised was a > blocker and although you responded you didn't allow time to see if he > agreed with you. Giving a response is not reaching consensus. > Sometimes you don't end up agreeing, but you need to allow time to see > if its possible.
I totally agree, that rushing is not a good practice. Thanks Niall for jumping in. -Matthias > > Niall > >> If possible I would like to apply Sebb's concerns in next M4 release that we >> will try to be perfect :) >> >> Thanks; >> >> --Gurkan >> >> >> ________________________________ >> From: Niall Pemberton <niall.pember...@gmail.com> >> To: general@incubator.apache.org >> Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2009 2:26:57 AM >> Subject: Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Release OpenWebBeans M3 >> >> On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 10:30 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu >> <cgurkanerdo...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Hi; >>> >>> The [VOTE] is now closed. The [VOTE] to release OpenWebBeans-M3 is >>> successful. >>> >>> There are three +1 binding >> >> The usual process is to allow 72hrs for a vote and not just declare it >> when 3 votes are received. Also Sebb raised an issue and IMO its good >> etiquette to allow discussions to run their course before declaring a >> vote. >> >> "Votes should generally be permitted to run for at least 72 hours to >> provide an opportunity for all concerned persons to participate >> regardless of their geographic locations." >> from http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html >> >> "The community then tries to gather consensus on an alternative >> proposal that resolves the issue. In the great majority of cases, the >> concerns leading to the negative vote can be addressed." >> from http://www.apache.org/foundation/how-it-works.html#decision-making >> >> Niall >> >>> +1 Votes >>> ----------------- >>> * Kevan Miller (binding) >>> * Matthias Wessendorf (binding) >>> * Niall Pemberton (binding) >>> >>> >>> I will add distribution artifacts to the incubator "dist/" place and >>> upload to m3-incubator-repository >>> >>> Thanks to all; >>> >>> -- Gurkan >>> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >> >> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
