On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 4:05 PM, Leo Simons <m...@leosimons.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 5:20 PM, Matthieu Riou <matth...@offthelip.org> > wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 8:31 AM, Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org> wrote: > >> > >> As Martijn alluded to, I think we'd need some more context as to why and > >> how they use RTC. > >> > > Yes, sorry for the lack of details. The context is Cassandra and they're > > doing RTC by community choice. They all seem to agree that RTC is the > best > > for their own codebase given that some parts of it can be pretty tricky. > And > > even committers who aren't too big on RTC generally speaking seem to > agree > > that it's working well for them (see [1] for the whole thread, including > > Paul's objection). So it really seems to be community driven. > > > > Thank for the inputs. > > Cassandra does about the same thing as hadoop right, where patches go > into jira for an explicit +1? > > Exactly. > While I think that's rather painful (if *I* were to do RTC I would > definitely want to manage it within SVN perhaps with the aid of > svnmerge.py), I don't think it is _wrong_. If the community really > wants to do it that way, I say let them. Sorry Paul :) > > cheers, > > Leo > > PS: for the record I've followed cassandra on and off and I would most > likely +1 on a graduation vote. > > Good to know :) Matthieu > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >
