On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 14:11, Kalle Korhonen <kalle.o.korho...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 10:51 AM, Greg Stein <gst...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 08:47, James Carman <ja...@carmanconsulting.com> >> wrote: >> I haven't followed this particular issue because it seems like a >> slamdunk easy thing. If the podling wants to change their name, then >> fine. Sounds easy enough. I would see no reason for anybody outside >> the podling to -1 that choice, and might even say that I'd be upset if >> they did... > > Sure, the podling can change the name and it can be completely dealt > with an internal matter. However, in this case, the name change was > put up for a procedural/opinion vote on the incubator general list. As > such, I might be upset if people are criticized for giving "the wrong > vote". Most non-positive votes in the thread are non-binding so the > project can ignore them if they like, but if you don't want the > opinion, don't put it up for a vote.
As I said, I haven't followed it. I meant if the -1 was a veto. If the IPMC was vetoing a podling's choices on stuff like this. If you're only using a vote as a preference/opinion marker, then sure... definitely no problems with that! Cheers, -g --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org