On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 7:31 PM, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com>wrote:
> > On Jun 5, 2011, at 5:19 PM, Alexandro Colorado wrote: > > > On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 7:16 PM, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com > >wrote: > > > >> > >> On Jun 5, 2011, at 5:12 PM, Alexandro Colorado wrote: > >> > >>> On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 7:08 PM, Ralph Goers < > ralph.go...@dslextreme.com > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>>> There is a pending trademark application for OpenOffice by Tightrope > >>>> Interactive so I am not sure that Apache OpenOffice would be > acceptable > >>>> unless the pending application is turned down. > >>>> > >>> > >>> I will still enoucrage that play safe according to OOo guidelines. Some > >>> information here: > >>> http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Art/Logo/License > >>> and > >>> http://about.openoffice.org/index.html#logo > >>> > >>> "OpenOffice.org" holds all rights to be used, so why not use it like > >> that? > >> > >> Sorry, I misread your message. I don't disagree with this. However, > Apache > >> OpenOffice.org is a bit of a mouthful. > >> > > > > Well the actual request is for the mailing list to be added an extra 'o' > > I doubt many people will pronouce 'ooo-user' or 'oo-user'. I just have an > > issue when is registered on the systems as 'oo' > > Got it. Feel free to update the wiki. If someone disagrees they will change > it to something else. > > Ralph > > Done, notice a similar scenario with JIRA 'code'. I think the best however is to educate the Apache people about the trademark and guidelines. I have the feeling none of the Apache people have read the OOo site regarding this topic. -- *Alexandro Colorado* *OpenOffice.org* Español http://es.openoffice.org
