Michael has posted here already, and will do so when he wants to make a statement. We don't need the reposting.
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 23:14, Keith Curtis <keit...@gmail.com> wrote: > He wrote this yesterday and it describes in different words why the > Apache license is not so pragmatic for LibreOffice. > ------------ > The problem is, that very much of our work is inter-dependent, and we > want people to be able to work all over the code, cleaning, translating > and fixing it. It would suck giant rocks (through a straw) to say: > > "no copy-left lovers need think of working on X Y or Z > big pieces of the code - since we want to license > changes to these on to IBM (via Apache)" :-) > > At least - I don't want to just push the division down into the > code-base, excluding people from lots of it (and of course throwing away > our changes to those pieces). > ------------ > http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/msg06351.html > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
