On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 11:17 AM, Phil Steitz <phil.ste...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 6/5/11 10:16 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
> > Wow.  Did it occur to you that the original project, Apache httpd,
> > was commercially exploited by vendors *even prior to the creation
> > of the Apache Software Foundation*?
>
> There is a difference between commercial entities using code vs
> manipulating communities.  Clearly we disagree on this and what the
> ASF is for.  Fine.  I hope there is room for both of our views.
>

I'm totally in agreement with Phil. There is a BIG difference in the two
positions and I for one would not support ASF being exploited. ASF products
being used for commercial success is absolutely superb.

> ASF members wish to devote considerable time and energy to this
> > project, so exactly who the hell are you to decide what they should
> > and shouldn't devote that time and energy to?
>

Um Bill you really should cool it a bit .. why are you getting so hot about
it? Phil too is a long standing member of the ASF and has every right to
comment on this!

I am just a volunteer who has seen the ASF struggle with
> growth-related issues for several years now.  I think it is a fair
> question to ask whether we should think about different / more
> selective criteria for entrance to the incubator.  Sorry if asking
> that question offends you.
>

+1. Those (esp. members) who find that question offensive need to take a
cold shower.

Sanjiva.
-- 
Sanjiva Weerawarana, Ph.D.
Founder, Director & Chief Scientist; Lanka Software Foundation;
http://www.opensource.lk/
Founder, Chairman & CEO; WSO2; http://wso2.com/
Founder & Director; Thinkcube Systems; http://www.thinkcube.com/
Member; Apache Software Foundation; http://www.apache.org/
Visiting Lecturer; University of Moratuwa; http://www.cse.mrt.ac.lk/

Blog: http://sanjiva.weerawarana.org/

Reply via email to