New candidate up at http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-2/. The only files RAT still sees missing license headers are Debian packaging files that are just lists of files, and test data files. README.md has been replaced with README. The gitignore files are, at least for now, excluded from the tarball. The webpage has been updated. The tarball has been built with GNU tar, rather than BSD tar.
Let me know if there are any more issues. Thanks! A. On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 11:45 AM, Andrew Bayer <andrew.ba...@gmail.com>wrote: > The README is formatted for GitHub - will update that shortly. The tarball > contents being weird I think is due to me having built the tar on OS X - > I'll build the next one on a Linux box to be safe. I'll try to get the files > missing headers today as well. > > A. > > > On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 4:28 AM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Just noticed that the README.md file contains the following: >> >> You can get in touch with us on the [user >> list](https://groups.google.com/a/cloudera.org/group/bigtop-user/topics) >> or [developer list]( >> https://groups.google.com/a/cloudera.org/group/bigtop-dev/topics). >> >> This also needs to be fixed before release. >> >> Why is this not a .txt file? >> >> On 20 August 2011 03:08, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > On 19 August 2011 23:14, Andrew Bayer <andrew.ba...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Ack, I screwed up and overwrote RC0 with RC1. In any case, please find >> RC1 >> >> at >> http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-1/. >> > >> > NOTICE looks good, and I can see DISCLAIMER. >> > Archive still contains .gitignore files, which should be excluded. >> > >> >> Website should update shortly. >> > >> > No sign yet. >> > >> >> A. >> >> >> >> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 3:00 PM, Andrew Bayer <andrew.ba...@gmail.com >> >wrote: >> >> >> >>> Oh, and I'm reformatting NOTICE now as well. The .gitignore files - >> I'll >> >>> open a bug to remove the top-level one from the tarball, but the ones >> that >> >>> show up deeper are expected by the build process. >> >>> >> >>> A. >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 2:58 PM, Andrew Bayer <andrew.ba...@gmail.com >> >wrote: >> >>> >> >>>> Which source files are missing the headers? I know there are some >> files >> >>>> without headers, but the ones I know of are that way because they're >> >>>> expected to be in certain formats, they don't allow comments, etc - >> these >> >>>> should only be Debian/RPM packaging files, unless I'm missing >> something. >> >>>> >> >>>> As to the package contents - as far as I can tell, everything is >> under >> >>>> bigtop-0.1.0-incubating. The contents there are the same as in SVN, >> same >> >>>> layout as in SVN, etc. The content under test is not yet being >> built/used, >> >>>> and may well be reorganized later, but it's all there. If there are >> any >> >>>> inconsistencies with what's in SVN, let me know and I'll check it >> out. >> >>>> >> >>>> Adding DISCLAIMER now. >> >>>> >> >>>> A. >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 2:48 PM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>>> >> >>>>> On 19 August 2011 19:25, Andrew Bayer <andrew.ba...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>>>> > This is the first incubator release for Apache Bigtop, version >> >>>>> > 0.1.0-incubating. >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > It fixes the following issues: >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12317549&styleName=Html&projectId=12311420 >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > *** Please download, test, and vote by Wednesday, August 24 (3 >> working >> >>>>> days >> >>>>> > from now) >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > Note that we are voting on the source (tag). >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > Source tarball, checksums, signature: >> >>>>> > >> http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-0/ >> >>>>> >> >>>>> A lot of source files don't have any license headers. >> >>>>> There's no DISCLAIMER in the archive; needs also to be added to SVN >> >>>>> alongside NOTICE and LICENSE. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> The DISCLAIMER text must also be prominently displayed on the bigtop >> >>>>> website. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> IMO these must be fixed before a release. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> The NOTICE file has a slightly different layout from normal (not a >> >>>>> blocker). >> >>>>> It would look better if the paragraph were wrapped after "developed >> >>>>> at" - as is normally done - because the URL would then not be left >> >>>>> dangling. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> I would not expect the .gitignore files to be included in the source >> >>>>> release. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> There seems to be a problem with the packaging of the archive - I >> >>>>> would expect all files to be under the top-level directory >> >>>>> bigtop-0.1.0-incubating, but there are also parallel directories >> >>>>> package, sqoop, smokes etc. This makes it very difficult to check >> the >> >>>>> archive against the source archive. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Again, I think this needs to be fixed before release. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> > The tag to be voted on: >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/tags/release-0.1.0-incubating >> >>>>> >> >>>>> > Bigtop's KEYS file, containing the PGP keys used to sign the >> release: >> >>>>> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/dist/KEYS >> >>>>> >> >>>>> sig is OK >> >>>>> >> >>>>> > Note that the Incubator PMC needs to vote on the release after a >> >>>>> successful >> >>>>> > PPMC vote before any release can be made official. >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > Thanks! >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > A. >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >> >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >> > >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >> >> >
