I'm curious if you also discussed using a hosted service like GitHub for
the projects. Seems to me that it would save us so much in resources and
time to take advantage of their free accounts for open source projects and
they seem to be doing a pretty good job. Perhaps there are concerns about
relying on a third party but for an organization powered by volunteers,
using a free service like this could be a great benefit. Perhaps there are
good reasons why this cannot be done but was wondering if it was discussed
at all.

-leo

On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 10:46 AM, Christian Grobmeier <grobme...@gmail.com>wrote:

> On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 7:38 PM, Jeremy Thomerson
> <jer...@thomersonfamily.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 1:30 PM, Christian Grobmeier <grobme...@gmail.com
> >
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> In addition you can ask on wave-dev. They have finally decided to
> >> loose history and do an initial checkin because it was not easily
> >> possible to convert.
> >
> > Why are we doing this on any project when we potentially have a git
> solution
> > around the corner?  Why not add these projects to the git experiment and
> > then only take this drastic action if the git experiment fails?
>
> This discussion was already held before a while. There are many
> questions to solve before.
>
> Cheers,
> Christian
> >
> > Jeremy Thomerson
> >
>
>
>
> --
> http://www.grobmeier.de
>



-- 

Leo Neumeyer (@leoneu)

Reply via email to