Hello Ant,

On Nov 17, 2011, at 16:56 PM, ant elder wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Karl Pauls <karlpa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 4:38 PM, ant elder <ant.el...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 3:14 PM, Karl Pauls <karlpa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Again, I'm not against doing things differently for future release
>>>> (and the reason this release looks like it does is because that is
>>>> configured like this in the apache-parent iirc). However, I'm still
>>>> confused what all of this has to do with the graduation proposal vote
>>>> and why this has to be on general@.
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> I think why its come up here now is because part of judging if a
>>> poddling is ready to graduate is if they understand how to make and
>>> review ASF releases properly. And with whats be said here and how the
>>> source has to be built i'm wondering if anyone who voted +1 for the
>>> release would have actually tried to build any of the source.
>> 
>> I guess the point is: are you arguing that the release should not
>> haven been accepted by the incubator in the first place on the grounds
>> that you find it hard to build and hence, you want to see a new one
>> before the we can vote on approaching the incubator for a graduation?
> 
> I'm not arguing anything yet. Some valid comments and questions were
> made in the vote thread, you asked why they were happening here and i
> tried to answer that. The Incubator people should have an opportunity
> to discuss a graduation, perhaps some of that might be better on a
> graduation discussion thread but there wasn't one of those before the
> vote.

Starting with that last remark, the vote that was started earlier today is the 
"Community Graduation Vote" where we as the ACE community vote to confirm that 
we are ready and willing to start the graduation process (as explained here 
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#tlp-community-vote). Before 
that, on the ACE list, and in the last board report, we already expressed that 
we feel we're ready to graduate. Whilst I don't mind adding a step before this 
one in the graduation guide, I am not aware of skipping a step in the process.

> The release does look a bit dubious to me.

Point taken, we appreciate all the feedback and will take that into account 
when doing the next release.

Greetings, Marcel

Reply via email to