+1 On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 3:25 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin <robertburrelldon...@gmail.com> wrote: > There has been concerns expressed about accumulation of rules without > pruning. In that spirit, I'd like to find out whether the community > feels that dropping the rule would be better than revising it into > something workable. > > The current check [1] is outdated (for example, www.nameprotect.com) > and isn't coordinated with the brand team who now look after marks and > names. I've been pushing through a revision of the existing rule > [2][3] with (what seems to me to be) limited support from the > community. I had assume that the community supported the rule but > perhaps the community feels that it would be better just to remove the > rule (and ask the board to handle names). > > This is a POLL. Anyone can vote and it's result isn't binding. It > provides evidence about which approach is more likely to gain > consensus. > > Robert > > [1] "Make sure that the requested project name does not already exist > and check www.nameprotect.com to be sure that the name is not already > trademarked for an existing software product." > [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH > [3] http://incubator.apache.org/guides/names.html > > --8<----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > [ ] Drop Suitable Name Search > [ ] Revise Suitable Name Search > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >
-- http://www.grobmeier.de https://www.timeandbill.de --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
