On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 5:08 AM, Jukka Zitting <jukka.zitt...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > +1 to graduate, with the following note: > > On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 10:04 PM, Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de> wrote: >> WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best >> interests of the Foundation and consistent with the >> Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management >> Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of >> open-source software related to creating an implementation >> compliant with JSR-303 and a library of pre-developed validators >> and extensions for distribution at no charge to the public. > > As noted by others, the project scope could use some clarification. > > Also, rather than referring specifically to "JSR-303", it would > probably be better to refer to "the Bean Validation API" to avoid > tying the project to a specific version of the API. For example the > Apache Jackrabbit resolution [1] referred to "the Content Repository > for Java Technology API" instead of "JSR-170" which would by now (with > JSR-283 and JSR-333 defining updated API versions) be outdated. >
What are the formal mechanics of refining the project description as suggested here and elsewhere, mid-vote? Or would a new vote be required? Matt > [1] > http://www.apache.org/foundation/records/minutes/2006/board_minutes_2006_03_15.txt > > BR, > > Jukka Zitting > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
