Thanks. Actually we're trying to separate them but there's some issues related with packaging web resources e.g., https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAMA-494
If it's not a blocker, I'd like to fix this issue in the next release. On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 9:22 PM, Franklin, Matthew B. <mfrank...@mitre.org> wrote: > For the packaging, a clean source package and a separate binary release is > preferred [1]. This isn't the blocker in my opinion, but something that > you should look at. > > [1]: > http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#best-practice-typ > es > > On 2/25/12 2:52 AM, "Edward J. Yoon" <edwardy...@apache.org> wrote: > >>>> The LICENSE file in the binary distribution needs to include 3rd party >>>> licenses included in the libs that are being re-distributed as part of >>>> your release. Your binary release artifacts include ant 1.7 (and >>>> potentially others) that has source covered by 3rd party licenses >>>>which I >>>> don't see in your LICENSE file. >> >>The ant is released under the Apache Software License and LICENSE.txt >>file contains the Apache license v2.0. >> >>http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/tags/0.4-RC6/LICENSE.txt >> >>I don't see any missed 3rd party licenses. Could you please check it >>again? > > > Ant itself includes code under a separate license. Since your binary > release includes the Ant jar, you are redistributing that code and need to > include its license. > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ant/core/tags/ANT_171/LICENSE > > > >> >>And, the distributions contains both source code and compiled jar files. >> >>> Anyways, if we have to go to a RC7, let's merge the new jiras from >>>trunk to >>> 0.4.0, compression and stuff can be great improvement. >> >>I don't think we have to create new one. Moreover, new stuffs are not >>tested enough yet. >> >>On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 3:44 PM, Thomas Jungblut >><thomas.jungb...@googlemail.com> wrote: >>> Hmm- I always thought it is Apache Ant and therefore Apache 2.0 >>>license. If >>> we have to add all transitive licenses we are going to release until the >>> overnext year. >>> What is wrong packaging the source within a binary distribution? >>> >>> Anyways, if we have to go to a RC7, let's merge the new jiras from >>>trunk to >>> 0.4.0, compression and stuff can be great improvement. >>> >>> 2012/2/25 Franklin, Matthew B. <mfrank...@mitre.org> >>> >>>> -1 at the moment due to source distribution and license concerns noted >>>> below. >>>> >>>> On 2/20/12 8:54 AM, "Edward J. Yoon" <edwardy...@apache.org> wrote: >>>> >>>> >Hi, >>>> > >>>> >I've create RC6 for the Apache Hama 0.4-incubating release. This fixes >>>> >the license header issue and adds rat-plugin. >>>> > >>>> >Signing KEYS: >>>> > >>>> >>>>http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/trunk/src/site/resources/ >>>>fi >>>> >les/KEYS >>>> >Artifacts: http://people.apache.org/~edwardyoon/dist/0.4-RC6/ >>>> >>>> Do you have a source artifact that is a simple archive of the SVN? >>>> >>>> Also, you can stage your artifacts at >>>> http://people.apache.org/builds/incubator/ rather than your own public >>>> html folder, but this is not required. >>>> >>>> >Tag: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/tags/0.4-RC6/ >>>> >NOTICE.txt: >>>> >http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/tags/0.4-RC6/NOTICE.txt >>>> >LICENSE.txt: >>>> >>>>>http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hama/tags/0.4-RC6/LICENSE.txt >>>> >>>> The LICENSE file in the binary distribution needs to include 3rd party >>>> licenses included in the libs that are being re-distributed as part of >>>> your release. Your binary release artifacts include ant 1.7 (and >>>> potentially others) that has source covered by 3rd party licenses >>>>which I >>>> don't see in your LICENSE file. >>>> >>>> >Staging website: http://people.apache.org/~edwardyoon/site/ >>>> > >>>> >You can run the "mvn apache-rat:check" command to check for license >>>> >headers. >>>> > >>>> >I tested this RC6 builds, single mode, and distributed mode on my 16 >>>> >nodes cluster and 5 VMs with EC2. >>>> > >>>> >Please retry, check signatures, licenses, and vote! >>>> > >>>> >I hope this will be a final, and +1. >>>> > >>>> >Thanks. >>>> >-- >>>> >Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon >>>> >@eddieyoon >>>> > >>>> >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> >To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >>>> >For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >>>> > >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Thomas Jungblut >>> Berlin <thomas.jungb...@gmail.com> >> >> >> >>-- >>Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon >>@eddieyoon >> >>--------------------------------------------------------------------- >>To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >>For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > -- Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon @eddieyoon --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
