On Feb 29, 2012 7:32 AM, "Mohammad Nour El-Din" <nour.moham...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Greg... > > On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 1:06 PM, Greg Stein <gst...@gmail.com> wrote: >... > > They remain. > > > > Keeping them is the right thing for our community and product. That is our > > determination, and is our Right. > > > > That is what we are trying to figure out here, and that is why we have this > discussion :) >... > Again and as I started in one of my earlier e-mails, no one is trying to > impose anything on Sqoop or any other project,
What? I've seen people say the vote should be canceled, that Sqoop needs to yank the code, etc. Those are most certainly impositions. This is no mere "discussion"; it is some number of people attempting to impose some unstated policy upon Sqoop before "allowing" them to graduate. >... > I gave it more thought and IMO, I think we should raise the issue to the > Board to get to some results, Raise what issue? I have not seen a statement of the problem, other than "projects sometimes deem it necessary to use package names in addition to org.apache". But I don't see the problem in that. Could you at least explain here before bringing a question to the Board? If it is legal in nature, then it should go to legal-discuss. Cheers, -g
