On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 1:28 PM, Alex Karasulu <akaras...@apache.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 3:01 PM, ant elder <ant.el...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 12:16 PM, Alex Karasulu <akaras...@apache.org > > >wrote: > > > > > On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 10:21 AM, Edward J. Yoon < > edwardy...@apache.org > > > >wrote: > > > > > > > > could you please close the "Create MRQL" tasks in the Infra Jira > > until > > > > > the situation has been cleared up. Whenever this all has been > sorted > > > > > out you can reopen the issues. > > > > > > > > Sure. > > > > > > > > Since this might not be fixed soon, proposal can be changed > > > > (especially corporation volunteers). And, thank you for your > > > > suggestion, but I'm already in initial committers list. > > > > > > > > To IPMC, I would request you to focus more on reviewing Proposal in > > > > the future. The opportunity of MRQL should not be faded by my > mistake. > > > > > > > > > > > Bravo! There was no malice in the vote, just a simple mistake. If need > > be I > > > or Mo can take on the Champion role. > > > > > > Are there others from the IPMC that would be interested in mentoring > > MRQL? > > > > > > -- > > > Best Regards, > > > -- Alex > > > > > > > The champion role is really just to help the proposal through any > > discussion prior to being accepted as a poddling so thats been done and > it > > makes little difference now. > > > True. I'm totally down with your reasoning. > > But don't you think it might be a formality we need to comply with, even if > it does not make sense at this stage? > > There has been a vote, which passed with enough binding votes, no one has -1'd, and no one has retracted their vote. Lets wait till Monday and if the majority vote still passes just carry on with the additional mentors. I hope no one does -1, theres several experienced mentors now so nothing really to be gained from forcing some new vote. ...ant
