On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 8:15 PM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 4 June 2013 01:04, Greg Stein <gst...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 5:45 PM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>... >>> I think that conflicts with the advice here: >>> >>> http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#mod-notice >>> >>> The last sentence says: "Do not add anything to NOTICE which is not >>> legally required." >>> >>> Being legal and being nice may not be completely disjoint but they are >>> certainly not identical. >> >> >> Let me turn it around: why should it NOT go in there? Why is it not >> legally required? > > Since the intention is to minimise the content of NOTICE, the onus > should be on showing that it must be in there rather showing why it > should not be there.
Already stated: If their code is under ALv2, then the license says we must put their copyright notice into our NOTICE file. Simple as that. -g --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
