Going once, going twice... ...ant
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 8:10 PM, Joe Schaefer <joe_schae...@yahoo.com>wrote: > It doesn't. People were just being pedantic > and untrusting of podling participants. Committers > have accounts, not formal standing in the org. There > is absolutely no reason for the IPMC to inject itself > in a podling election of a new committer, so let's just > leave oversight over the voting process to the mentors. > As a matter of fact, we don't even need to document a > standard for committer promotions- projects and podlings > alike are free to experiment with whatever process they > deem appropriate. Case in point is the Subversion process, > which essentially promotes new committers through lazy > consensus alone. > > IOW +1 to roll back to pre-May 1, 2007. > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: ant elder <ant.el...@gmail.com> > > To: general@incubator.apache.org > > Cc: > > Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 3:04 PM > > Subject: Re: Podling new committer votes > > > > Ok seems everyone so far is ok with changing this, so how far can this > go... > > > > In the "experiment" Joe commented "...basically rolling back the > > clock > > to May 1, 2007 on guides/ppmc.html" which is this change > > > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/public/trunk/content/guides/ppmc.xml?r1=517024&r2=542806 > > which added "Only votes cast by Incubator PMC members are binding". > > Before then podlings did their own committer votes and the Incubator > > PMC weren't involved. > > > > Good we go back to that? Why does the Incubator PMC need to be notified? > > > > ...ant > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >
