Dave, (or any other Incubator PMC member), LEGAL-182 is almost closed now
saying this license use by VXQuery is ok, so would anyone give this the one
more +1 vote it needs to get the release out?

Many thanks,

   ...ant


On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Dave Fisher <dave2w...@comcast.net> wrote:

> HI Ant,
>
> On Oct 11, 2013, at 2:03 AM, ant elder wrote:
>
> > Dave/Vinayak,
> >
> > My understanding is that the ODC-BY license only needs to be run by ASF
> > legal if there is a concern about it, I've read the license when voting
> on
> > this and AFAICT its fine (and the package is not being modified so it
> could
> > be cat A or B), and its not listed as an excluded license at:
> > http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-x. Are there any
> > particular clauses in the license that you have a concern about?
>
> IANAL - it is not on any list. I am not going to be an effective judge. If
> it is Class A then we are OK. If it is class B then it should not be in the
> source release, but should be pulled in from another location.
>
> This clause:
>
> > 2.4 Relationship to Contents in the Database. The individual items of
> the Contents contained in this Database may be covered by other rights,
> including copyright, patent, data protection, privacy, or personality
> rights, and this License does not cover any rights (other than Database
> Rights or in contract) in individual Contents contained in the Database.
> For example, if used on a Database of images (the Contents), this License
> would not apply to copyright over individual images, which could have their
> own separate licenses, or one single license covering all of the rights
> over the images. - See more at:
> http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/by/1.0/#sthash.z2xdvHcd.dpuf
>
> Further investigation into the contents may be required.
>
> >
> > Vinayak, the release does not need to be redone yet. If it really looks
> > like this will hold up getting another vote raise a ASF legal JIRA  (
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL) asking to confirm that
> ODC-BY
> > is ok.
>
> It holds me up.
>
> Regards,
> Dave
>
> >
> >   ...ant
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 6:39 AM, Vinayak Borkar <vinay...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Dave,
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Before I can VOTE I have questions.
> >>>
> >>> (1) What is the following file?
> >>>
> >>>   A     apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating/**vxquery-core/src/test/**
> >>> resources/documents/dblp.xml.**gz
> >>>
> >>> Am I correct that this shows up in your LICENSE as:
> >>>
> >>>    ==============================**==============================**
> >>> =======
> >>>
> >>>    The DBLP (http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/) database in
> >>>
> >>>        vxquery-core/src/test/**resources/documents/dblp.xml.**gz
> >>>
> >>>    can be used under the terms and conditions of the Open Data Commons
> >>>    Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0). The full ODC-BY 1.0 license text
> >>>    is avaialable at
> >>>
> >>>        http://opendatacommons.org/**licenses/by/1.0/<
> http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/by/1.0/>
> >>>
> >>> I don't see this license on http://www.apache.org/legal/**3party.html<
> http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html>
> >>>
> >>> Can you show me a reference from the Legal Discuss list:
> >>>
> http://www.apache.org/**foundation/mailinglists.html#**foundation-legal<
> http://www.apache.org/foundation/mailinglists.html#foundation-legal>that
> puts this in Class A? I think that this is required otherwise the
> >>> project will need to find a better way of packaging this source
> dependency.
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> The file is a standard XML file that is used for unit testing the
> parsing
> >> capabilities of the software. It is not critical to the release itself.
> >>
> >> Just to confirm, if there is no such mention on the mailing lists, do we
> >> have to create a new release without this dependency?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Vinayak
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>> (2) Does the podling intend in this VOTE to authorize the release of
> the
> >>> convenience binary artifacts that are also in the directory? I see from
> >>> discussions on the project that this is NOT intended. At least that is
> how
> >>> I view this email. [2]
> >>>
> >>> [2] http://mail-archives.apache.**org/mod_mbox/incubator-**
> >>> vxquery-dev/201310.mbox/%**3C1591541861.240305.**
> >>> 1381162348269.open-xchange%**40email.1und1.de%3E<
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-vxquery-dev/201310.mbox/%3C1591541861.240305.1381162348269.open-xchange%40email.1und1.de%3E
> >
> >>>
> >>> Regards,
> >>> Dave
> >>>
> >>> On Oct 7, 2013, at 8:59 AM, Till wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Please verify and vote on the fourth release candidate for our first
> >>>> release apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating.
> >>>>
> >>>> The tag to be voted on is
> >>>>
> >>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/**asf/incubator/vxquery/tags/**
> >>>> apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating/<
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/vxquery/tags/apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating/
> >
> >>>>
> >>>> at revision 1528941.
> >>>>
> >>>> The artifacts, signatures, md5, and sha1 are at:
> >>>> https://repository.apache.org/**content/repositories/**
> >>>> orgapachevxquery-128/org/**apache/vxquery/apache-vxquery/**
> >>>> 0.2-incubating/apache-vxquery-**0.2-incubating-source-release.**zip<
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachevxquery-128/org/apache/vxquery/apache-vxquery/0.2-incubating/apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating-source-release.zip
> >
> >>>> https://repository.apache.org/**content/repositories/**
> >>>> orgapachevxquery-128/org/**apache/vxquery/apache-vxquery/**
> >>>>
> 0.2-incubating/apache-vxquery-**0.2-incubating-source-release.**zip.asc<
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachevxquery-128/org/apache/vxquery/apache-vxquery/0.2-incubating/apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating-source-release.zip.asc
> >
> >>>> https://repository.apache.org/**content/repositories/**
> >>>> orgapachevxquery-128/org/**apache/vxquery/apache-vxquery/**
> >>>>
> 0.2-incubating/apache-vxquery-**0.2-incubating-source-release.**zip.md5<
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachevxquery-128/org/apache/vxquery/apache-vxquery/0.2-incubating/apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating-source-release.zip.md5
> >
> >>>> https://repository.apache.org/**content/repositories/**
> >>>> orgapachevxquery-128/org/**apache/vxquery/apache-vxquery/**
> >>>>
> 0.2-incubating/apache-vxquery-**0.2-incubating-source-release.**zip.sha1<
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachevxquery-128/org/apache/vxquery/apache-vxquery/0.2-incubating/apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating-source-release.zip.sha1
> >
> >>>>
> >>>> MD5:  381c212e2573b467855aa682a5e3ab**22
> >>>> SHA1: f07fe151ddea24457c6497a1abd485**28f9c02462
> >>>>
> >>>> The RAT report is at:
> >>>>
> >>>> http://people.apache.org/~**tillw/apache-vxquery-0.2-**
> >>>> incubating/rat-report.txt<
> http://people.apache.org/~tillw/apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating/rat-report.txt
> >
> >>>>
> >>>> and the KEYS file containing the PGP keys used to sign the release can
> >>>> currently
> >>>> be found at
> >>>>
> >>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/**dist/release/incubator/**vxquery/KEYS
> <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/vxquery/KEYS>
> >>>>
> >>>> The vote on vxquery-dev passed [1] with
> >>>>
> >>>> +1 (binding)
> >>>> Vinayak Borkar
> >>>> Cezar Andrei
> >>>> Jochen Wiedmann (IPMC)
> >>>> Ant Elder (IPMC)
> >>>>
> >>>> -1
> >>>> none
> >>>>
> >>>> Please vote
> >>>> [ ] +1 release this package as apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating
> >>>> [ ] -1 do not release this package because ...
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>> Till
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> [1] http://mail-archives.apache.**org/mod_mbox/incubator-**
> >>>> vxquery-dev/201310.mbox/%**3C511917E5-9FC9-4B6C-9DE3-**
> >>>> CF07EB4B69AB%40westmann.org%3E<
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-vxquery-dev/201310.mbox/%3C511917E5-9FC9-4B6C-9DE3-CF07EB4B69AB%40westmann.org%3E
> >
> >>>>
> >>>> ------------------------------**------------------------------**
> >>>> ---------
> >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.**apache.org<
> general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org>
> >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.**org<
> general-h...@incubator.apache.org>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> ------------------------------**------------------------------**---------
> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.**apache.org<
> general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org>
> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.**org<
> general-h...@incubator.apache.org>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> ------------------------------**------------------------------**---------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.**apache.org<
> general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org>
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.**org<
> general-h...@incubator.apache.org>
> >>
> >>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>

Reply via email to