Hey Marvin For Aurora everything is progressing nicely. All initial setup and on boarding is completed and development has started using ASF infrastructure (jira/reviewboard/etc). No blockers or issues at this time.
Usergid was not listed in the reports for this month, as a new podling less than 3 months old they should be reporting, have not dug into the xml yet to see what was not configured correctly. -Jake On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 3:04 PM, Marvin Humphrey <mar...@rectangular.com>wrote: > -------------------- > Allura > > (No shepherd review filed.) > > -------------------- > Aurora > > (No shepherd review filed.) > > -------------------- > BatchEE > > Marvin Humphrey (marvin): > > Podling did not report. Please report next month. > > Also, please edit podlings.xml metadata and address all "FIXME" tags. > > -------------------- > Apache: Project Drill > > Marvin Humphrey (marvin): > > The report is admirably thorough and must have taken a long time to > prepare. Perhaps consider that a report with a reduced level of detail > similar to the other reports may be more in line with Board > expectations. > > The report was filed too late to be incorporated into a review by the > assigned shepherd. Please file on time. > > Please wrap future reports at 77 columns, and please take more care > with > making indentation reflect logical hierarchy. Also, use only > s.apache.org URL shorteners in future reports. Otherwise, someone > downstream must clean up the report -- either someone from the IPMC (I > took care of reformatting this month) or the Board -- before it is > published in the official Board minutes. > > -------------------- > Falcon > > (No shepherd review filed.) > > -------------------- > Kalumet > > John Ament (johndament): > > Kalumet seems to be OK, but a little bit slow. They have been > incubating for a little over 2 years now, I think if they can get > together on another release shortly they should consider graduating, > there was some confusion for a little while over IPMC vs PPMC votes > which caused a delay in getting their 0.6 release out the door. > > -------------------- > MRQL > > Dave Fisher (wave): > > This podling achieved one benchmark towards successful incubation - a > release. > > When commits and mailing list activity are reviewed this looks like a > tiny community with only a single developer and some administrative > support. > > I am not sure if this another example of a community that is mostly > from > a single corporation and is doing all of the work outside and > contributing it through one person with off-list decision making and > communication. If so then the mentors need to look into it and get the > real decision making process in public. > > There is a user ML, but the only email ever on that list was the > release > announcement. > > -------------------- > NPanday > > Justin Mclean (jmclean): > > Last report was July 2013. At noted in the current report there are > some > issues to overcome for the project to move forward. > > In the last month there been some increased activity on the mailing > lists (thanks to the last shepherd) but as yet no fixes or patches have > been submitted. The project currently has only one mentor (just > appointed) and the PPMC seems to have gone missing. > > -------------------- > Ripple > > (No shepherd review filed.) > > -------------------- > S4 > > John Ament (johndament): > > The board report reflects my sentiments as well. S4 seems to be in a > bit of rut. I tried kicking off some conversations on the dev mailing > list, no luck. It seems like there are at best five active > participants, between the users list and dev list. Considering that > there hasn't been a commit since last board report, it doesn't come off > as a good sign for me. I think retirement may be an option to start > exploring. > > -------------------- > Sentry > > (No shepherd review filed.) > > -------------------- > Sirona > > Marvin Humphrey (marvin): > > Podling did not report. Please report next month. > > -------------------- > Storm > > Raphael Bircher (rbircher) > > Storm has started three months ago. It is quite active and looks ok, > so far. They created a last release outside Apache and they work now > at the IP. I noticed that http://incubator.apache.org/storm/ still > not exist. If you search at Google for storm, you only find the > GitHub page. I find a minimal site on the Apache server important. > so people can easely find ML and co. > > -------------------- > Streams > > (No shepherd review filed.) > > -------------------- > Tajo > > (No shepherd review filed.) > > -------------------- > Twill > > (No shepherd review filed.) > > -------------------- > Wave > > Christian Grobmeier (grobmeier): > > It was discussed to end graduation because lack of momentum, which led > to a lot of emails. So far there are a couple of people around but to > less who do actual coding work. It was discussed briefly to push > development via a Kickstarter project. So far there is no outcome of > the > discussions. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >
