On 3 September 2014 06:21, Branko Čibej <br...@apache.org> wrote: > On 03.09.2014 05:03, Jake Farrell wrote: >> Hi John >> I requested that Dave add the RC tag to better keep track of multiple >> release candidates and make it easier for testing and not mixing any >> previous version up accidentally. This is very common and currently done in >> many TLP's including Thrift, Mesos, and Cassandra to name a few. > > Agreed. And it is (or should be) normal process to start a new vote for > every new set of release bits. Even if 1.0.0 is just a repackaging of > 1.0.0-rc4, there may be bugs in the packaging process itself (such as > we've seen in this thread, when files that were not intended to be > released were bundled in the release artefacts), so the PPMC should test > and vote again. > > The vote should always refer to a particular release package (taken from > dist/dev), not to some tag in the repository.
There should be a repo tag AS WELL so it is clear which files comprise the source. > -- Brane > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
