On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 12:18 PM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 3 September 2014 16:26, Dave <snoopd...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 8:14 AM, John D. Ament <john.d.am...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > >> > >> So - just to confirm. If I look at > >> apache-usergrid-incubating-1.0.0-rc5-source.tar.gz the contents in the > >> pom.xml files will read the version "1.0.0-rc5" and the git tag will > also > >> read "1.0.0-rc5" then after you do an svn mv the pom files will be > updated > >> to read "1.0.0" ? If you look at Cassandra, this is how they do it. See > >> [1] and [2]. > >> > > > > No. The only things named with the RC designation are the actual release > > files, i.e. the tar.gz, zip, md5 and asc files. Inside the release files > > everything has the final release version number. That's by-design so we > can > > just rename the files when the vote passes. > > So the hashes and sigs are don't need to be regenerated, just renamed? > That seems fine to me. > It would help to include the hashes in the release vote so it's > possible to tie the vote to the RC and the final release files.
Good idea. I will do that from here on out. - Dave
