> On 30 Dec 2014, at 03:56, Bertrand Delacretaz <bdelacre...@apache.org> wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 9:32 PM, Andrew Purtell > <andrew.purt...@gmail.com> wrote: >> ...Certainly some projects have a de facto lead that coincide with Chair and >> I'm pretty sure >> in some cases that is an honorary arrangement agreed to by the community.... > > *loud red alarms going off all over my brain* > > If that's the case, such projects should make sure they implement a > regular PMC chair rotation. Or be prepared to go down in flames once > that leader changes their mind and no one has a clue how their project > runs.
Indeed. But outside of self-policing, is there a mechanism to ensure that something like this, disfavouring egoistic power, is in place? Note, I’m not sure it’s actually needed, just curious. > > -Bertrand > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
