On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 8:41 AM, Alan Cabrera <l...@toolazydogs.com> wrote: > > > On Jan 5, 2015, at 5:38 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz <bdelacre...@apache.org> > wrote: > >>>> On Jan 5, 2015, at 4:20 AM, Benson Margulies <bimargul...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> For your reading and wrangling pleasure, I offer: >>>> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/IncubatorV2. ... >> >> IIUC the main difference (besides subtle naming changes) is that pTLPs >> vote on their own releases, based on pTLP PMC members who have been >> accepted by the board? >> >> So more work for the board, and each pTLP needs to form an acceptable >> PMC roster with at least 4-5 members? > > My thoughts exactly. What this proposal effectively does is pawn off the > responsibility of holding mentors accountable to the board.
No. The original uncooked pTLP scheme did that. This scheme locates that responsibility in the renamed committee, which serves the board by supervising the pTLPs. They aren't mentors, they are PMC members. > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
