Sent from my iPhone
> On Jan 9, 2015, at 12:20 PM, Jim Jagielski <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> On Jan 9, 2015, at 3:01 PM, Rich Bowen <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >>> On 01/09/2015 02:03 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: >>> Another way to look at the Apache Way is as a musical composition. >>> Sure, it was written for a specific arrangement, but sometimes >>> it's played as a jazz piece, other-times as a classical, or maybe >>> with a blues flavor. But it is always (or*should be*) recognizable. >>> If you*don't* recognize it, then you've taken the "interpretation" >>> too far, if you get my meaning. >> >> What a delightful analogy. >> >> Of course, you're always going to get people who say that a disco rendition >> is fine, and others who say it's blasphemous. > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ouMaLRth-s > > "blasphemous"? Maybe. Recognizable? Yeah (fortunately or not) :) > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
