> On Jan 14, 2015, at 8:48 AM, Roman Shaposhnik <r...@apache.org> wrote:
> 
> Hi!
> 
> at this point we have had a few lively threads
> discussing three somewhat different proposals:
>   #1 mentor re-boot

https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/MentorRebootProposal 
<https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/MentorRebootProposal>

>   #2 pTLP

http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/IncubatorV2 
<http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/IncubatorV2>

>   #3 Ross's strawman http://s.apache.org/8eS
> it feels to me that all three need additional work
> to be done before we can have any reasonable
> consensus around them (let alone voting).
> 
> Wearing my chair hat, I would like to suggest that
> the next step should be: for each proposal we identify
> points that are going to block consensus (AKA would
> result in -1 vote if it comes to a vote). I suggest we
> do it on the wiki pages themselves (I'll wikify Ross's
> proposal tonight). Not editing the wikis but simply
> collecting this feedback as the last section in each
> proposal. The idea would be to identify all such
> points in a week or so.
> 
> Sounds good?

Thanks for picking this up. 

Does it make sense to make a matrix to compare them?  I’m happy to take a crack 
at it.  Could you field offline questions about #2 for me?


Regards,
Alan

Reply via email to