To confirm I was referring to TLPs, personally I don't spend anywhere near as much time on podling reports, as Bertrand indicates that's delegated today.
Sent from my Windows Phone ________________________________ From: Bertrand Delacretaz<mailto:bdelacre...@apache.org> Sent: 1/23/2015 1:22 AM To: Incubator General<mailto:general@incubator.apache.org> Subject: Re: Next steps for various proposals (mentor re-boot, pTLP, etc.) On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 4:18 PM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) <ross.gard...@microsoft.com> wrote: > The board do take on such an active task.... I'm not sure what you mean exactly - IMO board members do pay close attention to TLP reports (in more or less detail depending on our perception of the project's health), but we might not look at each podling report in as much detail. The board has delegated management of podlings to the Incubator PMC, so IMO it's fine for board members to just look at the Incubator summary report, and mostly skim through podling reports, maybe look more closely at a few that stand out for some reason. -Bertrand --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
