On 23 February 2015 at 03:07, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> wrote:
> On Sun Feb 22 2015 at 10:38:23 AM Marvin Humphrey <mar...@rectangular.com> > wrote: > > > On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 3:44 AM, Olivier Lamy <ol...@apache.org> wrote: > > > I don't see any comments here: http://wiki.apache.org/ > > incubator/February2015 > > > > I'm the one who categorized Sirona under "Report incomplete" in the > > "Summary > > of podling reports" section: > > > > * Report incomplete > > > > Sirona > > > > I honestly thought Sirona's report was a work in progress when I did that > > because several sections had been left blank. > > > > > So I wonder what sort of administrative stuff is missing?... > > > > It's not "administrative stuff" that's missing. The problem is that > until > > Matt filed his Shepherd review, there was literally nothing in the report > > describing the state of the Sirona community. > > > > The following sections were left empty: > > > > * `Three most important issues to address in the move towards > > graduation:` > > * `How has the community developed since the last report?` > > * `When were the last committers or PMC members elected?` > > > > (The full report is pasted below my sig for reference.) > > > > The Board consistently follows up after TLPs who neglect to answer that > > last > > question. If the Incubator teaches that such reports are acceptable, I > > don't > > think it's doing a very good job because such reports are unlikely to be > > acceptable to the Board. > > > > That's actually why I raised my question. I had assumed the board would > have flagged Sirona as not having a complete report and expected it again > next month, yet I saw nothing mentioned in the board report (probably > because there was a high volume of missing reports, this one skirted by?) > about Sirona's not being accepted. > > > > > > However, when I flagged Sirona in the draft report review thread, nobody > > responded. In the absence of IPMC consensus that Sirona's report was > > unacceptable, I opted to defer to the Sirona Mentors who signed off and > did > > not pursue the matter further. > > > > And that's where I think we leave things regarding the subject of this > > thread, > > "Should Sirona be monthly?": Sirona should not be required to report next > > month, in deference to its Mentors. > > > > And that's where I'm struggling a bit with Sirona. Olivier's the active > guy on the project, PPMC and Mentor. OpenHub and GitHub agree > > https://github.com/apache/sirona/graphs/contributors > https://www.openhub.net/p/sirona/contributors > > You can even see in Olivier's email to the dev alias that he considered the > report to be incomplete (only started). > > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/sirona-dev/201502.mbox/%3CCAPoyBqSRbOv6Y3pkQMqkCjzz3wOhqrV0yHrEyX4aNaP_FsvfEw%40mail.gmail.com%3E > > Thoughts? > I missed to answer to my own email saying that's finished. Sorry I reckon I'm really bad on administrative papers things.... Olivier > > John > > > > > > Marvin Humphrey > > > > -------------------- > > Sirona > > > > Monitoring Solution. > > > > Sirona has been incubating since 2013-10-15. > > > > Three most important issues to address in the move towards graduation: > > > > 1. > > 2. > > 3. > > > > Any issues that the Incubator PMC (IPMC) or ASF Board wish/need to be > > aware of? > > > > None > > > > How has the community developed since the last report? > > > > > > > > How has the project developed since the last report? > > > > Some refactoring of the UI. A contributor made some development to > have > > some features still working with java 1.5 > > > > Date of last release: > > > > 2014-06-26 > > > > When were the last committers or PMC members elected? > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: > > > > [x](sirona) Olivier Lamy > > [ ](sirona) Henri Gomez > > [x](sirona) Jean-Baptiste Onofre > > [ ](sirona) Tammo van Lessen > > [ ](sirona) Mark Struberg > > > > Shepherd/Mentor notes: > > > > Matthew B. Franklin (mfranklin): > > > > Lot's of code is being committed to the project, but mostly by a > > couple of > > developers. There also does not appear to be much discussion on the > > list > > in last period, likely due to the low number of developers. > > > > I recommend the podling focus on increasing the size and > participation > > of > > the community as one of the issues to address prior to graduation. > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > > > -- Olivier Lamy http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy
