Below is a revised TLP resolution for Usergrid for review. I added to the
list our mentors Jim J and Jake F. I believe the list is complete now.
Also, I removed the below paragraph, which is unnecessary and only exists
because I copied some other project's resolution. We don't need special
Usergrid bylaws, the ASF bylaws are good enough.
RESOLVED, that the initial Apache Usergrid Project be and hereby
is tasked with the creation of a set of bylaws intended to
encourage open development and increased participation in the
Usergrid Project; and be it further
I welcome any suggestions or other feedback on this resolution.
Dave
Apache Usergrid top-level project resolution:
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best
interests of the Foundation and consistent with the
Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management
Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of
open-source software related to the Usergrid BaaS software,
for distribution at no charge to the public.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management
Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache Usergrid Project",
be and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the
Foundation; and be it further
RESOLVED, that the Apache Usergrid Project be and hereby is
responsible for the creation and maintenance of open-source
software related to the Usergrid BaaS software; and be it further
RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Usergrid" be and
hereby is created, the person holding such office to serve at
the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair of the
Apache Usergrid Project, and to have primary responsibility for
management of the projects within the scope of responsibility
of the Apache Usegrid Project; and be it further
RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and
hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the
Apache Usegrid Project:
* Tim Anglade <timangl...@apache.org>
* Askhat Asanaliev <aasanal...@apache.org>
* John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org>
* Ed Anuff <edan...@apache.org>
* Furkan Bıçak <fbi...@apache.org>
* Ryan Bridges <ry...@apache.org>
* Jake Farrell <jfarr...@apachge.org>
* Scott Ganyo <scottga...@apache.org>
* Sungju Jin <sun...@apache.org>
* Dave Johnson <snoopd...@apache.org>
* Alex Karasulu <akaras...@apache.org>
* Salih Kardan <skar...@apache.org>
* Jim Jagielski <j...@apache.org>
* Shaozhuang Liu <st...@apache.org>
* Nate McCall <zzn...@apache.org>
* John Mcgibbney <lewi...@apache.org>
* Alex Muramoto <amuram...@apache.org>
* Todd Nine <toddn...@apache.org>
* Luciano Resende <lrese...@apache.org>
* Yiğit Şaplı <yig...@apache.org>
* Rod Simpson <rockers...@apache.org>
* Jeff West <jeffreyaw...@apache.org>
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Todd Nine
be appointed to the office of Vice President, Usergrid, to serve
in accordance with and subject to the direction of the Board of
Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until death,
resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification, or until
a successor is appointed; and be it further
RESOLVED, that the initial Apache Usergrid Project be and hereby
is tasked with the migration and rationalization of the Apache
Incubator Usegrid podling; and be it further
RESOLVED, that all responsibility pertaining to the Apache
Incubator Usergrid podling encumbered upon the Apache Incubator
PMC are hereafter discharged.
On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 3:51 PM Dave <snoopd...@gmail.com> wrote:
> There is no VOTE in progress.
>
> We voted to graduate on the Usergrid dev list, I forwarded the results of
> the vote to this list and added a draft TLP resolution for review. As I
> said when I forwarded the email, I will will call for an IPMC vote shortly.
>
> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html
>
> Dave
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 3:35 PM Ted Dunning <ted.dunn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Marvin Humphrey <mar...@rectangular.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > However, please do not change the text of any VOTE (graduation, entry
>> > into incubation, release approval, anything...) while it is underway.
>> > That retroactively changes the meaning of votes already cast, which is
>> > problematic. There are better ways to be flexible.
>> >
>>
>> To be concrete, some of the ways that I know about include:
>>
>> 1) cancel this vote and start a new one with an edited proposal. Since
>> the
>> podlings suggested text is effectively only a suggestion just as the
>> resolution that the IPMC provides to the board is just a suggestion, this
>> is a fine procedure
>>
>> 2) start a side vote to include a note asking the board to change the
>> resolution. This is finicky and not as straightforward as (1).
>>
>
