Thanks Dave, and I'm recommending that we follow Marvin's advice. We should have renamed the subject of this to [DISCUSS] but that's a non-issue at this point. (renamed it myself)
I'm curious about how, in general, the incubator feels about Usergrid graduating. Is anyone concerned with it? John On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 9:13 AM Dave <snoopd...@gmail.com> wrote: > I removed that paragraph from the latest version of the TLP Resolution. It > was a mistake; only there because I copied some other project's resolution. > > - Dave > > > On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 8:50 AM Marvin Humphrey <mar...@rectangular.com> > wrote: > > > On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 1:29 AM, Pierre Smits <pierre.sm...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > What is the reasoning behind the requirement to have the board of the > ASF > > > task the PMC of the intended project to define a set of project bylaws > > that > > > couldn't have been established during incubation? > > > > > > What are the circumstances that require this TLP (to be) to have a set > of > > > bylaws that are different from the -overall- policies and guidelines of > > the > > > ASF? > > > > We discussed this at length on dev@community a few weeks back. It's > > an ASF issue rather than something which applies to Usergrid > > specifically. > > > > Usergrid might choose to strike the paragraph about drafting bylaws > > from the proposed resolution, but they don't have to. Whether that > > passage is in or out does not block graduation. If this thread > > becomes another battleground for the wider issue, Usergrid should feel > > free to watch from a distance. > > > > Marvin Humphrey > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > > >
