Am 18.08.2015 18:46, schrieb Marvin Humphrey:
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 2:02 AM, Kalle Korhonen
So what if a project (members) does not vote but unofficially
releases binary executable packages, perhaps along with source to some
other location than /dist/? Clearly, it's not an official release by Apache
policy but there the bits are in the wild anyway.
At Apache, software that is published beyond the group that develops it must
be assembled, vetted and voted in accordance with Release Policy and
distributed in accordance with Release Distribution Policy.
http://www.apache.org/dev/release
http://www.apache.org/dev/release-distribution
does this extend to convenience binaries and binaries not produced by
the project itself?... let's say for example a windows installer
Apache is deliberately decentralized in that technical decisions are
officially delegated to a PMC, but projects are still obligated to follow
Foundation policy with regards to project governance, IP diligence, etc. A
primary function of the Incubator is to prepare projects to self-govern in
accordance with Apache policy and traditions.
And a project could choose to just "tolerate" this such binaries, right?
[...]
bye blackdrag
--
Jochen "blackdrag" Theodorou
blog: http://blackdragsview.blogspot.com/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
