the +1 bindings listed in the result were the ipmc votes, ie: - Mark - Justin - Daniel - and me
Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber <http://www.tomitribe.com> 2015-10-05 9:30 GMT-07:00 John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org>: > I'm fine either way. Could the podling forward their result at least with > the IPMC binding votes listed? > On Oct 5, 2015 11:58, "Marvin Humphrey" <mar...@rectangular.com> wrote: > > > On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 8:50 AM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > I'm not sure that matches what we are saying. > > > > It matches what I was saying -- I think the thread was (barely, > > arguably) within the letter of Incubator policy and thus it's not > > necessary to run another vote. But it sure would be nice if the > > original vote thread had been clearer and spared us all this extra > > meta discussion. > > > > Marvin Humphrey > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > > >
