Hi, I agree with Justin and Bertrand's analysis, but I would also request that you open a LEGAL Jira requesting that the MX4J license be added to the list of approved licenses.
MX4J is not only similar to Apache 1.1, but also to the PHP license. http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved#category-a Here's a diff of the text of Apache 1.1 vs. MX4J: https://paste.apache.org/DJgO Marvin Humphrey On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 4:50 AM, Justin Mclean <justinmcl...@me.com> wrote: > Hi, > > INAL but this is what I would do: > - Add a pointer (i.e. path to the file) and the copyright owner to the full > text of the license in LICENSE > - Add the notice “This product includes software developed by the MX4J > project ..” mentioned in the MX4J license to the NOTICE file > > (i.e. exactly would you would do with an old Apache license) > > Thanks, > Justin > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
