Done. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-244
Anthony > On Apr 6, 2016, at 8:57 AM, Marvin Humphrey <mar...@rectangular.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > I agree with Justin and Bertrand's analysis, but I would also request > that you open a LEGAL Jira requesting that the MX4J license be added > to the list of approved licenses. > > MX4J is not only similar to Apache 1.1, but also to the PHP license. > > http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved#category-a > > Here's a diff of the text of Apache 1.1 vs. MX4J: > > https://paste.apache.org/DJgO > > Marvin Humphrey > > On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 4:50 AM, Justin Mclean <justinmcl...@me.com> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> INAL but this is what I would do: >> - Add a pointer (i.e. path to the file) and the copyright owner to the full >> text of the license in LICENSE >> - Add the notice “This product includes software developed by the MX4J >> project ..” mentioned in the MX4J license to the NOTICE file >> >> (i.e. exactly would you would do with an old Apache license) >> >> Thanks, >> Justin >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
