Frank pointed me to this commit - which changes a bunch of things to Apache
License:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-madlib/commit/a6acafdd54bd5e5d53ac3b7fb4b6621c042af460#diff-600376dffeb79835ede4a0b285078036

John

On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 8:58 PM Orhan Kislal <okis...@pivotal.io> wrote:

> John,
>
> I am checking MADlib github page for the src/utils folder and it indicates
> that the latest commits are from 4-5 years ago. Could you point us to the
> commit tag that you mentioned?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Orhan
>
> On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 5:47 PM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Frank,
> >
> > Then those files should have Apache headers (they're not listed in the
> > explicitly licensed area & are part of a commit that added apache
> > headers).  Can you explain why you think they're not subject, or what
> > license they're falling under?
> >
> > John
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 8:41 PM Frank McQuillan <fmcquil...@pivotal.io>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > John,
> > >
> > > src/utils files were in the original commit by Roman when we brought
> the
> > > files into ASF:
> > >
> > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-madlib/commit/
> > a6acafdd54bd5e5d53ac3b7fb4b6621c042af460#diff-
> > 600376dffeb79835ede4a0b285078036
> > > and they have not been changed since that time.
> > >
> > > tag: a6acafdd54bd5e5d53ac3b7fb4b6621c042af460
> > >
> > > So I do not believe any changes to NOTICE/LICENSE are required for
> > > src/utils
> > >
> > > Frank
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 5:28 PM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 8:01 PM Frank McQuillan <
> fmcquil...@pivotal.io>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi John,
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks for reviewing the release.
> > > > >
> > > > > Regarding the exclusion list, during the first Apache incubator
> > release
> > > > for
> > > > > MADlib 1.9 alpha, there was a legal-discuss thread on how to
> proceed
> > > with
> > > > > headers that came from pre-Apache days when MADlib was under a
> > 2-clause
> > > > BSD
> > > > > license.
> > > > >
> > > > > The agreement was to add them to the exclusion list as per:
> > > > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/www-legal-discuss/
> > > > >
> 201603.mbox/%3C9D1AF43C-370B-4E58-B0EF-2E29D242F50B%40jaguNET.com%3E
> > > > > which we have done for the prior 2 releases.  So for this 3rd
> release
> > > we
> > > > > did the same.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Ok, that clarifies part of it.  I don't see a call out for src/utils.
> > > Why
> > > > are those in the exclusion list and will you be updating
> > NOTICE/LICENSE?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Please let me know if you have any questions on this.
> > > > >
> > > > > Frank
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 4:18 PM, Rahul Iyer <rahulri...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > >  Hi John,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > We've uploaded the KEYS file to apache dist
> > > > > > <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/madlib/KEYS>
> and
> > > > > didn't
> > > > > > use any public server for the previous 2 releases.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I've uploaded my key (which was used for the signature) to
> > > > > keyservers.net
> > > > > > and should be available now after you update your local cache. Is
> > > this
> > > > > the
> > > > > > Apache recommended server to use?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > - Rahul
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 1:53 PM, John D. Ament <
> > johndam...@apache.org
> > > >
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > I'm getting a problem with your key.  Can you look at it and
> tell
> > > me
> > > > if
> > > > > > you
> > > > > > > think the issue's on my end?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Johns-MBP-2:Downloads johnament$ gpg --verify
> > > > > > > apache-madlib-1.9.1-incubating-source.tar.gz.asc
> > > > > > > gpg: assuming signed data in 'apache-madlib-1.9.1-
> > > > > > > incubating-source.tar.gz'
> > > > > > > gpg: Signature made Fri Sep  2 12:05:14 2016 EDT using RSA key
> ID
> > > > > > 6C725F40
> > > > > > > gpg: requesting key 6C725F40 from hkps server
> > > > > > hkps.pool.sks-keyservers.net
> > > > > > > gpgkeys: key 52B795C96C725F40 not found on keyserver
> > > > > > > gpg: no valid OpenPGP data found.
> > > > > > > gpg: Total number processed: 0
> > > > > > > gpg: keyserver communications error: Not found
> > > > > > > gpg: keyserver communications error: Bad public key
> > > > > > > gpg: Can't check signature: No public key
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Do I need to import your KEYS file or is your key uploaded to a
> > > > public
> > > > > > > server?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > John
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 12:40 AM Frank McQuillan <
> > > > fmcquil...@pivotal.io
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Hello Incubator PMC,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The Apache MADlib (incubating) community has voted on and
> > > approved
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > > proposal to release MADlib v1.9.1-rc2.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The voting result is available at:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-madlib-
> > > > > > > dev/201609.mbox/%3CCAKBQfzT0pw1%3DP-KWuZVsAwORdHdz792WvUtR-DbM%
> > > > > > > 2BH8EkiZdSA%40mail.gmail.com%3E
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > This is the 3rd release for Apache MADlib (incubating).
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The main goals of this release are:
> > > > > > > > * new modules (1-class SVM for novelty detection, prediction
> > > > metrics,
> > > > > > > > sessionization, pivoting)
> > > > > > > > * improvements to existing modules (class weights in SVM,
> > > > overlapping
> > > > > > > > patterns in path)
> > > > > > > > * performance improvements (path)
> > > > > > > > * platform updates (PostgreSQL 9.5 and 9.6)
> > > > > > > > * bug fixes
> > > > > > > > * doc improvements
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > For more information including release notes, please see:
> > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MADLIB/
> > MADlib+1.9.1
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > To run check RAT, please do:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > $mvn verify
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > first to get the correct RAT output.  Look inside of pom.xml
> to
> > > see
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > > classes of exceptions we're managing there for RAT.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > We're voting on the source (tag):
> > > > > > > > rc/1.9.1-rc2
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Source Files:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/madlib/1.9.
> > > > > > > 1-incubating-rc2
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Commit to be voted upon:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-madlib.
> > > > > > > git;a=commit;h=e1c99c1538dc124c9b323ba76382ba2af05c6892
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > KEYS file containing PGP Keys we use to sign the release:
> > > > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/madlib/KEYS
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Please vote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > [ ] +1  approve
> > > > > > > > [ ] +0  no opinion
> > > > > > > > [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > *** The vote will be open until Friday Sept 9 at 6 pm Pacific
> > > time.
> > > > > ***
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to