+1 for subproject. On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 7:57 AM Leigh Stewart <lstew...@twitter.com.invalid> wrote:
> +1 > > On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 2:48 PM, Uma gangumalla <umamah...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > Regards, > > Uma > > > > On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 5:21 PM, Sijie Guo <guosi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > ( /cc bookkeeper dev@ and incubator general@ for awareness ) > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > There was a joint discussion between BookKeeper PMC and DistributedLog > > PPMC > > > about moving the development of DistributedLog as part of Apache > > > BookKeeper. The reasons behind it are: > > > > > > First, DistributedLog is born as an extension to BookKeeper, to offer > > > continuous log streams as the service. The ledger API in bookkeeper is > a > > > lower level API and has learning curves, while the log stream API in > > > distributedlog is a higher level API that simplifies the usage. The > > > combination of ledger API and stream API would offer a better > > > developer/user experience for applications. > > > > > > Secondly, using ledgers to build continuous (re-openable) log stream > is a > > > very common pattern for BookKeeper use cases. We did this for HDFS > > namenode > > > journal, for Hedwig, for DistributedLog, and for Pulsar. The same > pattern > > > has been implemented again and again. Merge DistributedLog (also > > > ManagedLedger in Pulsar) with BookKeeper will consolidate all the > > > development efforts around this common 'log stream' pattern. > > > > > > Thirdly, the 'log' stream abstraction is a good abstraction for both > > > messaging and streaming. Internally at BookKeeper, there are a few > places > > > that can use such 'messaging' facility to improve bookkeeper itself. > the > > > log stream in DistributedLog can be used internally at bookkeeper for > > > streaming changes as well. > > > > > > We choose merging DistributedLog as subproject rather than modules. It > > is a > > > softer starting point to avoid disrupting the folks who are depending > on > > > the ledger api alone. The BookKeeper PMC and DistributedLog PPMC has > > > achieved initial consensus on this merge. There is an official VOTE > > ongoing > > > in bookkeeper PMC. We'd like to bring this to the distributedlog > > community > > > for a community vote following the guidelines here > > > <http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#subproject>. > > > > > > Please vote +1 if in favor of merging DistributedLog to BookKeeper, and > > -1 > > > if not. The vote will be open until Tuesday 13rd June, 18:00 PST. > > > > > > - Sijie > > > > > > -- -franck
