In general I think it's a great Idea.
I would really like to bring this to my new Apache colleagues in the PLC4X
project ... this way they could get up to speed with the formal stuff.
But I think the tool does need a little optimization ;-)
I think from 5 questions I got about 1 right ;-)
But I guess it was mainly cause I interpreted the answers as if they are
aggregated to form a correct answer.
For example I interpreted the answers "3 +1 votes" and "more +1 than -1" as
being ANDed to form the correct answer, but Justin told me "more +1 than -1" is
correct as you could also have "3 +1 and 100000 -1 votes". This was not obvious
to me and I think if the aggregation of all answers form the correct one, It
would be more intuitive. I would really like a quiz like that that lists up
different parts and all that are correct have to be clicked. It requires to
know the same information, but doesn't make you mad if you missed some little
trick ;-)
Chris
Am 25.01.18, 08:55 schrieb "Justin Mclean" <jus...@classsoftware.com>:
Hi,
> I return to my point: "No" was the best answer (tho its qualifiers were
> wrong), and the "Yes" was wrong for that question.
Yes I agree No is the best answer (and is the correct answer is just about
every single case) and Yes is wrong in that question. Is "Yes but only for some
common build tools.” correct or not, currently I have it down as correct, but
if it’s not as your saying then the text (and title) at [1] I think would need
to change. May be best to bring up on legal discuss?
Thanks,
Justin
1. https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#build-tools
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
