Hi Bertrand, > On Mar 1, 2018, at 10:20 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz <bdelacre...@codeconsult.ch> > wrote: > > Hi Craig, > > On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 1:19 AM, Craig Russell <apache....@gmail.com> wrote: >> I apologize for coming late to this discussion, but longstanding policy >> is to accept either SGA or CCLA that identifies the contribution to the >> satisfaction of the contributor.... > > So IIUC this means you agree with the way this has been handled?
I agree with accepting Intel's CCLA/grant for "Felix" and proceeding with IP Clearance. I agree with the conclusion that Intel's explicit grant for "Felix" as identified on Schedule B of the CCLA provides sufficient coverage for us to remove Intel's copyright statements on the code donated to Felix. > > I'm asking just to make sure the archives of this thread provide a > very clear answer, > in case we have similar situations in the future. I hope that this thread will inform future situations where a CCLA/SGA is descriptive but not extremely detailed. Craig > > -Bertrand > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > Craig L Russell Secretary, Apache Software Foundation c...@apache.org http://db.apache.org/jdo --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
