+1 to a transfer rather than Attic. On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 2:05 AM, Stian Soiland-Reyes <st...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi, > > The Taverna podling has its code in multiple git repositories > https://taverna.incubator.apache.org/code/ > Most of these were imported from the initial Software Grant > > > The Taverna PPMC has voted to retire two legacy git repositories that > will stay behind when/if we graduate. > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-taverna-plugin-component > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-taverna-plugin-bioinformatics > > VOTE Result: > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/547b87fa93601d42ef77a778f80bf5 > 9fe9a300fffd7d3a6bcb7a7d81@%3Cdev.taverna.apache.org%3E > > > These code bases have NOT fully completed the IP clearance/license > checks (there would be a couple of files that have unknown authorship > or the odd GPL dependency), but have already got the Apache License > headers for the rest (majority) of the codebase, that was covered by > the Software Grant. Would we need to remove/change those headers? > > Do the IPMC need to vote on such 'retiring' of a code case? > > > Our plan is to do a GitHub owner transfer to our affiliated > https://github.com/taverna-extras/ -- but do let me know if you think > Apache Attic would be better (we could delete the files that miss the > headers). > > Do IPMC think that it's OK that we do such a GitHub transfer > (effectively giving a HTTP redirect) rather than just > forking+deleting? > > -- > Stian Soiland-Reyes > http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9842-9718 > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >
