Hi I am doing some research on incubator projects and the ones that didn't make it to TLP could be interesting to analyse so I'd be in favour of the rename rather than a delete for now.
Thanks Sharan On Mon, 14 Jan 2019, 07:12 Myrle Krantz <my...@apache.org wrote: > If we can’t name a reason for keeping the data, I’d be inclined to just > delete. We are not data squirrels. > > : o), > Myrle > > On Sun, Jan 13, 2019 at 10:15 AM Daniel Gruno <humbed...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > Hello IPMC and other folks, > > > > We have a big bunch of retired podlings with git repositories on > > git-wip-us. As we are working on retiring this service, we need to > > address what happens with these old project repositories. > > > > The retired podlings we need to address are: > > blur, cmda, concerted, corinthia, cotton, gearpump, gossip, hdt, horn, > > htrace, iota, mrql, openaz, pirk, provisionr, quickstep, ripple, s4, > > slider, wave > > > > Before February 7th, we at ASF Infra, would love if the incubator could > > decide what happens to these repositories, either individually or as a > > whole. > > > > Some suggested options are: > > > > 1) delete the repositories > > 2) rename them to incubator-retired-$foo.git > > 3) Do nothing, but put a note on github etc that they retired. > > 4) punt it to the attic if possible (you'd have to coordinate with the > > Attic PMC then) > > 5) Something else?? > > > > Please talk among yourselves and let Infra know :) > > > > With regards, > > Daniel on behalf of ASF Infra. > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > > >
