Thanks, Marcus. Looking forward for the VOTE thread. This would be great addition to Apache Software Foundation.
- Henry On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 9:56 AM Markus Weimer <wei...@apache.org> wrote: > Thanks everyone for the discussion thus far. Based on it, I have uploaded > an updated proposal here: > > https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/TVMProposal > > The changes made are: > > 1. Rectify the language around PMC vs. PMC member. Thanks Greg, for > pointing that out! > 2. Adding Furkan, Timothy and Henry as additional mentors. We can use > all the help :) > > Assuming there are no further discussion points, I'd like to move forward > with a [VOTE]. I'll let this sit here and simmer for another 24h to make > sure we are done with the discussion phase. > > Thanks, > > Markus > > > On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 1:08 PM Tianqi Chen <tqc...@apache.org> wrote: > > > Thanks, everyone for helpful feedbacks. I would like to clarify a few > > points being raised so far on behalf of the current TVM PMC. > > > > > PMC vs PMC member > > > > Thanks for pointing it out. This is something we overlooked and will > update > > the proposal to make the change accordingly. > > > > > Champion > > > > Markus has been actively engaging with the TVM community and helped the > > community start the incubation process. These efforts include: > > - Introduce the Apache way to in the TVM conference last Dec > > - > > > https://sampl.cs.washington.edu/tvmconf/slides/Markus-Weimer-TVM-Apache.pdf > > - Help the community to start the incubation conversation(also Thanks to > > Sebastian and Gon) > > - https://github.com/dmlc/tvm/issues/2401 > > - Watch the pre-incubation private list, and give helpful feedback > > > > While we do not expect our mentor to actively watch the community on the > > daily basis(many of our committers only contribute a few days in a week), > > he has been very responsive and helped us to shape the incubation > proposal > > and most importantly be a strong advocate of the Apache way. I personally > > think he is more than qualified as our champion:) > > > > > Hardware artifact > > > > INAL, however, given that Apache only releases source code and our source > > code is in the form of software source code (HLS C and we are moving to > > Chisel-(scala) ). Then anyone can take the software source code and > > generate unofficial hardware release. > > > > Tianqi > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 6:44 AM Bertrand Delacretaz < > > bdelacre...@codeconsult.ch> wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 11:44 AM Justin Mclean < > jus...@classsoftware.com > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > If the Apache License works for those artifacts I think that's > > fine... > > > > > > > > It probably doesn’t, but it's complex and INAL, but I have touched on > > > this about this in IoT talks at previous ApacheCons... > > > > > > FWIW the prior discussions that I mentioned are linked below - from > > > board@ so accessible for ASF Members of Officers only, but we can > > > distill them as needed if a concrete need appears with TVM. > > > > > > We didn't go past the discussions stage at that time (2011) but if > > > there's another case of hardware at the ASF I'm willing to help > > > restart those discussions to move this forward. Either to define which > > > additions to the Apache License are required, or to clarify that it's > > > ok as is. > > > > > > So unless there are specific objections about accepting a project > > > which includes hardware as a software artifact I'm in favor of > > > accepting TVM and sorting out these things during incubation. > > > > > > -Bertrand > > > > > > Prior board@ discussions at https://s.apache.org/hw2011_1 and > > > https://s.apache.org/hw2011_2 > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > > > > > > >
