Thanks for your input as well Matt! Next time we'll discuss upfront whether IP clearance is necessary or not. Consider this case as a "better safe than sorry" one.
With that said, 72 hours have passed so the vote is closed with the following results: +1: Furkan Kamaci Matt Sicker Roy Lenferink (hereby adding my +1) No -1 votes have been cast. Thanks all for your input, Roy Op wo 21 aug. 2019 om 20:21 schreef Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com>: > I would think that if the person who submits the PR has the rights to > make that contribution, then their ICLA should cover that. See > https://www.apache.org/licenses/contributor-agreements.html for more > info. > > On Wed, 21 Aug 2019 at 11:49, Roy Lenferink <lenferink...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > Given it was already had a ASF license header and from a ASF project > why > > was IP clearance even needed? I assume the person involved has signed a > > ICLA? > > > > The individual contributors all submitted an ICLA and a CCLA for the > > company is already present. We were following IP clearance > > because the written software was developed outside of the ASF version > > control system (company internal VCS). After that, we squashed everything > > into a single commit and submitted it as a PR to Celix. > > > > Would IP clearance be necessary in this case (duplication of an already > > existing component)? Would IP clearance be necessary for new components > > which already have ASF headers in place? > > > > -- > Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >
