+1 this seems like the best option. On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 2:29 PM Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1 this would be a good outcome. Both Tephra and OMID are good > technologies, with respective pros and cons, and Phoenix can make good use > of both of them, should they choose to accept ownership of the code. > > On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 11:26 AM Alan Gates <alanfga...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Justin and mentors of Omid and Tephra, > > > > As Justin noted in his emails to these podlings this month both are very > > low activity, struggling to even file their reports, and appear to be > > candidates for retirement. > > > > The situation here is somewhat special because Phoenix uses one or both > of > > these technologies (they are both transaction managers on top of HBase), > so > > they may have an interest in their continued survival. Tephra briefly > > discussed this last June[1], though nothing came of it. My conclusion is > > there is not enough momentum left for these podlings to vote themselves > > into Phoenix without an external push. > > > > So before we push them into retirement I believe we should involve the > > Phoenix PMC and see if they want to adopt either or both of these, with > the > > knowledge that they will likely be getting minimal contributions from > > current members of those projects going forward. If others are ok with > > this I can contact the Phoenix PMC and see if they wish to take any > action > > on this. > > > > Alan. > > > > 1. > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/87ace080ef8a967b238781979a8d9a0cb9607ac4a195d5937756ec66@%3Cdev.tephra.apache.org%3E > > > > > -- > Best regards, > Andrew > > Words like orphans lost among the crosstalk, meaning torn from truth's > decrepit hands > - A23, Crosstalk >
