Hi, That all sound good to me.
> Although the driver file itself is MIT, because linux kernel driver has a > policy that open source driver has to be dual licensed to GPL, the driver > declaration declared the binary module as GPL. That explains it, and it would be fine to include it. For things that are dual licensed (i.e license A or B rather than containing A and B) you can select the most compatible license. [1] Thanks, Justin 1. https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#mutually-exclusive --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
